Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2026

First Page

633

Journal Title Abbreviation

Ark. L. Rev.

Abstract

The United States accounts for about 25% of the world’s prisoners but only about 5% of its population. It has the fifth highest imprisonment rate—higher than China and Russia—with people of color disproportionately impacted. This racialized mass incarceration, and the lack of political will to meaningfully address it, demands bold remedies. ...

So, what should attorneys do for clients like Pat when no viable release mechanisms remain: concede defeat and move on, or collaborate with those who are willing to ignore the law and grant release anyway?

This article proposes that the second option, which I call “collaborative nullification,” can provide the over-punished needed relief, thereby diminishing our carceral state. Part I explores how previous authors have treated the separate but related concepts of prosecutorial nullification and judicial nullification. Drawing from my former work as an attorney with the Ohio Justice & Policy Center’s Beyond Guilt Project, Part II demonstrates how my real-world efforts at collaborative nullification succeeded and failed. Part III addresses the ethical issues my proposal raises and discusses how my collaborative model fits into our adversarial system. Finally, Part IV completes Pat’s story and shows that the pursuit of collaborative nullification can pay dividends even when it fails.

Download

Share

COinS